Commonwealth v. Ruth
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
Johnnie Lee Ruth was tried by jury and was found guilty of murder in the third degree in connection with the bedroom slaying of his wife. On direct appeal from the judgment of sentence, he contends (1) that the Commonwealth’s evidence was insufficient to prove his sanity at the time of the killing and (2) that the trial court erred in allowing the prosecution to make a pre-trial examination of edited, defense, psychiatric reports. We find no merit in these contentions and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of sentence.
In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence the test is…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LovetteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. McCuskerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. RoseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. DemmittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. WeinsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TrillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. ZeweSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. SohmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. PetrinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.