People v. Clapper
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.
The defendant, Clapper, and a codefendant McPherson, both were charged with robbery; both pleaded not guilty, and the issue raised was one of identification; and both were found guilty of robbery in the first degree. The defendant appeals, seeking a reversal of the judgment on the grounds (1) that the evidence is insufficient to identify him as one of two persons committing the subject robbery; (2) that illegally obtained admissions by him were introduced in evidence contrary to the rule in People v. Dorado, 62 Cal.2d 338 [42 Cal.Rptr. 169, 398 P.2d 361]; and (3) that an instruction by the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- People v. ModestoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. WebbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. FioravantiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- People v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- People v. CrosslinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- People v. HanamotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.