State v. Smith
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BURNETT, Judge.
This case presents a potpourri of issues relating to a conviction of first degree burglary and to a determination that the defendant is a persistent violator. The convicted defendant, Wilburn Smith, asserts that his trial on the burglary charge was tainted by a denial of due process because (1) the court admitted unreliable identification testimony; (2) an alleged accomplice invoked the Fifth Amendment privilege, frustrating Smith’s right of cross-examination; and (8) an accumulation of errors resulted in an unfair trial. With respect to the persistent violator determination,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. CheathamIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. PachecoIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
- Boman v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. HarringtonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. HydeIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.