Legal Opinion

Hillier v. Eldred

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Branch. (Loveridge, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The-facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLons, J.

This action was brought in justice’s court to recover the sum of $45, balance due on a contract for building a barn upon defendant’s farm. Plaintiff had judgment for the amount of his claim.

The defendant is a married woman, the owner of the farm upon which the barn was built, as well as the other property situate thereon. The contract, as claimed by. the-plaintiff, was made with the defendant through her son, . George Eldred. The defense was that Mrs. Eldred never j employed the plaintiff to build the barn, and that the-I contract was made by her son, George Eldred.

The defendant testified…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Newcomb v. AndrewsMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Popp v. ConneryMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Minot Plumbing & Heating Co. v. BachNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Lindsley v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API