Legal Opinion

In re Nathan

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 15, 1928No. 12584Published

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.

This case now comes before the court on excep*433tions to the report o£*J. R. W. Baker, referee in bankruptcy, as special master, to whom the case was referred to take testimony and make report thereof to the court of his findings of fact, together with his recommendations in favor of, or against, the discharge of the bankrupt.

We have considered these exceptions and are of the opinion that they must be sustained, because it does not appear, in connection with the report of the special master recoramending against the discharge, that there was any actual testimony taken…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. Koblegard Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1910
  2. In re MalschickDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API