Legal Opinion
Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Kern International, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 30, 2006No. 3:05 CV 1455(JBA)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL AND FOR SANCTIONS
MARGOLIS, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Pitney Bowes, Inc. commenced this litigation on September 15, 2005 against defendant Kern International, Inc. [“KII”], alleging patent infringement of United States Letters Patent No. 5,083,769, entitled “Dual Collating Machine” [“'769 Patent”]. (Dkt.# 1). On April 28, 2006, defendant filed its Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims (Dkt.# 41), to which plaintiff filed its Answer and Reply on May 18, 2006. (Dkts. #43-44).
On August 16, 2006, plaintiff filed the pending Motion to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Shirley Small v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Martin v. Valley National BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. British Aerospace, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Scott v. Arex, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Rialto v. United States Department of DefenseDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
- A. Mark Getachew and Denora Getachew v. L&S Investments, LLC, Lawrence Rutkowski, and Eric D. GraysonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2026
- Ledesma v. Marriott International, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
- Meridian Laboratories Inc v. OncoGenerix USA, IncDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
- Meridian Laboratories Inc v. OncoGenerix USA, IncDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.