Legal Opinion

Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 29, 1966No. C.D. 2723PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EichaRdsoN, Judge:

The merchandise covered by the instant protests, consolidated for trial, consists, among other things, of cameras, leather camera cases, and other camera accessories which were imported at New York from West Germany. Protest 63/448 covers 15 entries, and protests 63/8970 and 63/9414 each cover a single entry. The protests were filed against the collector’s denial of the importer’s request for relief under 19 U.S.C.A., section 1520(c) (1) (section 520 (c) (1), Tariff Act of 1930), by means of the correction of a mistake of fact or clerical error in the entries. At the trial,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Berkery, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. J. S. Sareussen Marine Supplies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. PPG Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API