City of Harrison v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George Rose Smith, Justice.
This zoning case involves the appellee’s residence in Harrison, which she uses partly as a beauty shop. By permission of the municipal board of adjustment Mrs. Wilson employed an assistant who does' not live on the premises. The city brought suit to enjoin that arrangement, as a violation of the ordinance. At the trial the parties stipulated that their dispute turns upon whether the board authorized a variance, as it may do, or authorized a nonconforming use, as it may not do. The chancellor found that the exception amounts to a variance and was therefore lawfully…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- C. & C. INCORPORATED v. SempleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1966
3Cited by1 opinion
- Davidson v. City of Little RockCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995