Legal Opinion

Willard v. Sturm

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 21, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Pottawattamie District Court. — Hon. Walter I. Smith, Judge. This is a garnishment proceeding in which plaintiff is seeking to subject to the payment of a judgment he holds against defendant Sturm certain wages due Sturm from the railroad company. The lower court rendered judgment against the garnishee, and it appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.

*5571 2 3 *556The case involves less than one hundred dollars, and comes to us on the following certificate, made by the trial judge in the manner required by law: “This was an action commenced before Ovide Vien, justice of the peace in and for Kane township, Pottawattamie county, Iowa, by A. H. Willard, a resi- • dent of Iowa. E. H. Sturm was an employe of the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co., residing in and earning his wages in Kansas. As head of a family ■his wages were exempt,in said state. The action was commenced December 13, 1893. The company answered seventy-seven dollars and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. SharittSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  2. German Bank v. American Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  3. Foster & Hannum v. ByrneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Elson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  2. Schmidt v. PosnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  3. Leech v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API