Hawkins v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Justice.
A jury found appellant guilty of delivery of a simulated controlled substance, and the trial court sentenced him to ten years’ confinement. In his first point of error, appellant contends that the trial court erred in failing to conclude that he established a prima facie case of racial discrimination in the State’s use of peremptory challenges, and the trial court should have required the State to present its reasons for the peremptory strikes. The State contends that because appellant’s objection was untimely, he was not entitled to a Batson 1 hearing. We agree with…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Keeton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Henry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Dewberry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Howard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hutchinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Hawkins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
- Somerville v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
- Marshall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992