Legal Opinion

Paulk v. Braxton

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 26, 1990No. 90-323Published

1Per curiam

Rayburn Paulk sought relief from this court by petition for writ of prohibition or habeas corpus, contending his incarceration for contempt for failure to pay an alimony arrearage was improper. We denied prohibition finding the remedy was inappropriate where the trial court had already acted, English v. McCrary, 348 So.2d 293, 297 (Fla.1977). After issuing an order directing the former wife to respond to the petition for writ of habeas corpus and considering the merits of the response, we granted relief by unpublished order. We now issue this opinion to explicate our reasons for doing so.

Petit…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bowen v. BowenSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. English v. McCrarySupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  3. Lamm v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  4. Moskowitz v. MoskowitzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  5. Rosenberg v. RosenbergDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API