Legal Opinion

L.A. S.L.R. Co. v. Lytle

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1935No. 3097PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The liability of a railroad company for injury resulting from the collision of a road vehicle with a car or train standing on a highway crossing is generally predicated upon negligence. St. Louis, etc. R. Co. v. Guthrie (Ala.), 114 So. 215; 56 A.L.R. 1110. The only finding of fact upon which plaintiff in this case could predicate negligence is that the defendants did not use the measure of care and diligence required of a railroad company under the circumstances. Even though this finding is too general and does not specify wherein the defendants failed to use the required measure of care and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. HussIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. Brinson v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  4. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. GillespieIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. Gulf, M. N.R. Co. v. HolifieldMississippi Supreme Court · 1929

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McDonald v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1967
  2. Nevada Transfer & Warehouse Co. v. PetersonNevada Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API