Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Bogner

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 15, 1991No. 89CA0860PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge HUME.

Plaintiffs, Edna Jo and Michael Jordan, individually and on behalf of their minor son Joseph, appeal a judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of defendant, Phillip J. Bogner. Although defendant filed a notice of cross-appeal raising additional contentions of error, those contentions have neither been briefed nor argued, and the cross-appeal is deemed abandoned. We affirm the judgment.

Defendant, a board certified family practitioner, was the attending physician during Joseph’s birth at St. Joseph Hospital in Del Norte, Colorado, on April 21, 1985. Complications…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ravin v. Gambrell, by and Through EddySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. Greene v. ThomasColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Connelly v. KortzColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Hotchkiss v. PrebleColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Short v. KinkadeColorado Court of Appeals · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jordan v. BognerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API