Deering v. City of Seattle
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
Plaintiff, Henry Deering, was a Seattle fireman for approximately 8% years and had achieved “regular” as distinguished from “probationary” civil service status. He received written notice from the fire chief that, because of charges submitted by his superior officers, a “trial board” “disciplinary” hearing would be conducted pursuant to Seattle fire department regulation 5.04.03 (c). A hearing was held and the trial board recommended that “Deering’s employment in the Department should be terminated.” Thereafter, the chief, acting in his capacity as the “appointing authority” and pursuant to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Vitarelli v. SeatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Danielson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Messer v. Snohomish County Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Ticeson v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Eiden v. Snohomish County Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Francisco v. Board of Directors of the Bellevue Public Schools, District No. 405Court of Appeals of Washington · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.