Legal Opinion

Phillips v. O'Neal

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 14, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Promissory .notes. Evidence. Boundaries. Contracts. Interest. Fraud. Demand. Before Judge Van Epps. City Court of Atlanta. ' December term, 1889. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Blandford, Justice.

Mrs. Phillips brought an action againstO’Neal to recover what was due upon two promissory notes. O’Neal pleaded a total failure of consideration, in that he alleged that the notes sued on were given for certain land which he bought from Mrs. Phillips; that at the time of the purchase she alleged that she was the owner of the land, and relying upon and believing these statements made by her, he gave the notes sued on; but that in truth the land did not belong to her at the time, but to him by a purchase made by him from one Love, of which fact, however, he was ignorant at…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Price v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  2. Phillips v. O'NealSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  3. Dennis v. RaineyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API