Legal Opinion

Farmers National Bank v. Pratt

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 14, 1922PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Plymouth District Court. — William Hutchinson, , Judge. Suit upon a promissory note given by the defendant in payment for stock in the Alfalfa & Cereal Milling Company, of Sioux City. The defendant pleaded fraud in the inception of the note. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant, and the plaintiff appeals. —

1Opinion of the CourtFaville, J.

i bills and purchasers^aduee síüpSas question. — This case presents the not unusual situation of a suit by a purchasing bank..upon a promissory note given by a subscriber' to corporation stock. Appellant claims to be a bona-fide purchaser of said note in due course. -Appellee pleaded that the note was.secured by false and fraudulent representations on the part 0£ 0fgcers an¿ agents of the corporation in which he purchased stock, in payment for which he executed the said note. The evidence shows that the appellee is a farmer, about 30 years of age, residing in the vicinity of Kingsley, Iowa.

On…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Connelly v. Greenfield Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  2. Gibson v. SeneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. Banning v. MarleauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. First National Bank v. WiseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  5. Roberts v. OziasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Mammoth Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  2. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924
  3. First National Bank v. DuttonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  4. Gregg v. Middle States Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  5. Second National Bank v. ScanlonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API