Legal Opinion

Hirschl, Etc. v. Richards

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 3, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Vickery, j.

This action comes into this court on a petition in error to the common pleas court; the purpose being to reverse the judgment in favor of the defendants in error against the plaintiff in error.

It seems that the plaintiff in error had a contract to install a furnace and pipes for the heating of a certain house owned by the defendants below, for a contract price of $475; that $79 was to be paid at once, and the remainder in payments of $38 a month; that, after the contract was made, the furnace was installed, and the sum of $79 was paid, and subsequently another payment of $20 for…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Trajcevski v. BellOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Schumacher v. Iron Fireman Manufacturing Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API