Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dick v. Supreme Body of the International Congress

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1904No. Docket No. 75Published

Error to Wayne; Mandell, J. Assumpsit by Emma C. Dick against the Supreme Body of the International Congress on a policy of insurance. There was judgment for plaintiff on a verdict directed by the court, and defendant brings error.

1DissentHooker, J.

The plaintiff’s husband was a member of the order of the Supreme Body of the International Congress, a mutual benefit association, having been admitted upon an application containing the following agreement:

“This application and the laws of the supreme body now in force or that may hereafter be adopted, are made a part of the contract between myself and the supreme body, and I for myself and my beneficiary or beneficiaries, agree to conform to and be governed thereby.”

The certificate issued upon said application was for $1,000, payable to himself and wife as beneficiaries, and was expressly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hembeau v. Great Camp of Knights of MaccabeesMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Rose v. Supreme Court, Order of PatriciansMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Fillmore v. Great Camp, Knights of MaccabeesMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Barker v. Great Hive, Ladies of the Modern MaccabeesMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Derry v. Great Hive, Ladies of the Modern MaccabeesMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API