Legal Opinion

Stone Container Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided October 5, 1998No. Slip Op. 98-143. Court No. 96-10-02366PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RESTANI, Judge:

This matter is before the court on cross motions for summary judgment. The only issue in dispute is the applicable limitations period for the recovery of Harbor Maintenance Taxes (HMT) from defendant.

The Supreme Court has ruled that suit is to be brought here under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(i) (1994), United States v. United States Shoe Corp., — U.S. -, -, n. 3, 118 S.Ct. 1290, 1294, n. 3, 140 L.Ed.2d 453 (1998). The applicable limitations period for suits brought under 28 U.S.C. § 1581® is 28 U.S.C. § 2636® (1994). The statute provides:

§ 2636. Time for commencement of action(i)…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. United States v. BrockampSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Former Employees of Sonoco Products Co. v. Elaine Chao, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  2. Former Employees of Siemens Information Communication Networks, Inc. v. HermanUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
  3. Former Employees of Sonoco Products Co. v. Elaine Chao, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  4. Spadt v. WickhamDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API