Legal Opinion

State v. Lindgrove

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided September 18, 1895PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Memorandum. — Appeal from Jewell district court; Cyrus Heren, judge. Prosecution brought by The State against Neis Lindgrove, charging him with a violation of the prohibitory liquor law. Judgment for The State. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gilkeson, P. J. :

This was a criminal prosecution brought by The State against Neis Lindgrove, under the provisions of the prohibitory law, charging the *52defendant with keeping and maintaining a common nuisance. The information as originally filed, and upon which the first trial was had, contained two counts, and two verdicts were rendered therein, viz. : “Not guilty as to the first count, and guilty as to the second count.” The warrant issued in this action contained what is commonly called the ' ‘ search and seizure clause,” and certain articles were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thurlow v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
  2. Beer Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Bartemeyer v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Intoxicating-Liquor CasesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  5. State v. SchaeferSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Plumb v. ChristieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Mathis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  3. Reed v. TerritoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  5. Gallaghan v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API