Legal Opinion

Jans v. City of Evanston

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 9, 1964No. Gen. 49,652PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Drucker

The defendant, City of Evanston, appeals from a judgment declaring that its zoning ordinance is unreasonable, arbitrary, confiscatory, unconstitutional and void as regards plaintiffs’ property.

The action was commenced by the filing of a complaint seeking a declaratory judgment and other relief in June of 1962. Plaintiffs Charles and Anna Jans and Michael Leider alleged that the were the owners of certain property within the corporate limits of the defendant city and plaintiffs Roy Gottlieb and Kenneth Tucker alleged that they were contract purchasers of this land from the above-mentioned…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bennett v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  2. First Nat. Bank of Lake Forest v. County of LakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Exchange National Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Jacobson v. City of EvanstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Standard State Bank v. Village of Oak LawnIllinois Supreme Court · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Siegel v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
  2. Reskin v. City of NorthlakeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  3. Kellett v. County of Du PageAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  4. Harshman v. City of DeKalbAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  5. Village of Gurnee v. MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API