Legal Opinion

Hale v. Wheeler

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 9, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

The plaintiffs sue for damages resulting from the removal of themselves and their belongings from prem- . ises in Berlin. The defendants justify under executions for possession issued by a district court in summary processes *593for the recovery of land. The plaintiffs claimed trial to a jury by request indorsed upon their writ; but when the case was reached for trial in the Superior Court, their attorney agreed in open court that, with two other cases, it be referred to an auditor. Rule to the auditor issued on June 10, 1926, which set out “findings of facts to be final.” On June 17, 1926, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Moulton v. BowkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  2. Habib v. EvansMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Merrimac Chemical Co. v. MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. First National Bank v. BernierMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  3. Newsome v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  4. Swisher v. McMainSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  5. Butter v. SovrenskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API