Legal Opinion

Davis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 12, 2004No. 5D04-771PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

886 So.2d 332 (2004)

Charles O. DAVIS, Jr., Petitioner,

v.

STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 5D04-771.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

November 12, 2004.

Charles O. Davis, pro se.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

GRIFFIN, J.

Petitioner, Charles O. Davis, Jr. ["Davis"], filed this petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Florida Rule Appellate Procedure 9.141(c), alleging that his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to argue on direct appeal…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Perkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  3. Giles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  4. Greene v. MasseySupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  5. Marshall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Martinez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  2. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. Granberry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  4. Sipple v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  5. Hawk v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API