Legal Opinion

Hi-Line Electric Co. v. Travelers Insurance Companies

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1980No. B-8893PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

The application for writ of error is refused with the notation no reversible error. Our action should not be interpreted as approving the conclusion of the court of civil appeals that a private action under article 21.21 of the Insurance Code must be based on the Deceptive Trade Practices Act nor as approving the court’s holding that, “A ‘person’ as used in article 21.21(16)(a) must be a consumer as defined in section 17.50 of the DTPA . . . .” 587 S.W.2d at 490.

Article 21.21, § 16 provides in pertinent part:(a) Any person who has been injured by another’s engaging in any of the practices…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Royal Globe Insurance Co. v. Bar Consultants, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cameron v. Terrell & Garrett, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Riverside National Bank v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Bellefonte Underwriters Ins. Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Kelly, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1984
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Martin Surgical Supply Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API