Legal Opinion

Vitteck v. Washington Broadcasting Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 12, 1978No. 827PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge:

Appellant, George W. Vitteck, filed a complaint in trespass seeking redress for alleged defamatory statements broadcast by the defendant-appellee, Washington Broadcasting Co., Inc. This appeal is from the order of the court below sustaining appellee’s preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer to the complaint.

At the outset, we reiterate two fundamental principles. First, when considering preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer all well-pleaded material facts alleged in the complaint, as well as all the inferences reasonably deducible therefrom, must be…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Corabi v. Curtis Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Birl v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Allstate Insurance v. FioravantiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Cosgrove Studio & Camera Shop, Inc. v. PaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Clevenstein v. RizzutoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Agriss v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Beckman v. DunnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Veno v. MeredithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Gordon v. Lancaster Osteopathic Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. McNulty v. Borden, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API