Johnson v. Crookshanks
Oregon Supreme Court
Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.
This is an action of ejectment. The complaint alleges: “That the plaintiff is the owner and entitled to the possession” of the demanded premises. The defendant answered, denying plaintiff’s ownership and *340right to the possession, and set up title in herself and the statute of limitation by way of defense. After issue joined, and before trial, defendant moved to dismiss the action upon the ground that the complaint did not contain a sufficient allegation of title to give the court jurisdiction. The overruling of this motion is the only error assigned on this appeal.
In an action to recover the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Leprell v. . KleinschmidtNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Clark v. CregoNew York Supreme Court · 1867
- Hadlock v. HadlockIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
- Thompson v. WolfOregon Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Ninety-Nine DiamondsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Woodward Governor Co. v. City of Loves ParkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1948
- Directors of Fallbrook Irrigation District v. AbilaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- West v. Washington Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1907
- Warren v. Lower Salt Creek Drainage DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.