Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Roger Lacy, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 31, 1966No. 195PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNAGAN, Chief Justice.

This suit was instituted in the trial court by James T. Carroll, Jr. and wife, Naomi Carroll, against the appellees' to declare a lease held by the appellees, R. Lacy, Inc. and J. W. Griffith, to be terminated and prayed for judgment to remove cloud from title on their property and that they have judgment against the appellees, jointly and severally, for the recovery of title to an undivided one-fourth (⅛⅛) of the oil, gas and other minerals in and under the 94.88 acre tract of land in controversy.

The appellants further alleged in their third original amended petition:

“T…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Warren Petroleum Corporation v. MonzingoTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Guffey v. StroudTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  3. Grogan Manufacturing Co. v. LaneTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Stradley v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  5. Neeley v. County of TarrantTexas Supreme Court · 1939

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sun Oil Company v. WhitakerTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Coca Cola Bottling Company of Houston v. HobartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  3. Trio Transport, Inc. v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Sun Oil Company v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  5. Sykes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API