Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Teasley

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 27, 2007No. CR-06-0811PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The petitioner, Clinton Samuel Teasley, filed this petition for a writ of mandamus directing Judge John Rochester to correct his institutional records to reflect that a rape charge against Teasley had been dismissed. Teasley's action in circuit court appears to be an action pursuant to § 41-9-645, Ala. Code 1975. That Code section establishes a procedure by which a convicted defendant may challenge inaccurate information contained in his institutional records. However, this Court does not have jurisdiction to consider an appeal from a § 41-9-645 proceeding; therefore, we cannot consider a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nunn v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Ex Parte HargettCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  3. Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. EagertonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Jefferson County v. ACJICSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  5. Ex Parte StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clemons v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  2. McMillian v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015
  3. Stowe v. Ala. Bd. of Pardons & ParolesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017
  4. Jackson v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  5. McMillian v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API