Neilson v. Pool
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from the court of the fourth district for the parish of Iberville, the judge of the second district presiding. This is an action on a promissory note. The note of defendant became due on the 1st December, 1889, and suit was commenced the 3d Sep- [210] tember preceding.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the court of the fourth district for the parish of Iberville, the judge of the second district presiding. This is an action on a promissory note. The note of defendant became due on the 1st December, 1889, and suit was commenced the 3d Sep- [210] tember preceding. The plaintiff alleges in his petition that the note was given for the balance due him on a settlement for his wages as an overseer, with a mortgage and privilege on the growing crop; that the defendant he fears and verily believes intends to send off the cotton crop as fast as it is picked, out of the jurisdiction of the…
1Opinion of the Court
Mastín, J.
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is an action against the maker of a promissory note given for overseer’s wages, secured by a special mortgage attempted to be given on the growing crop of the defendant. The note is payable on the first of December, 1839, at the Union Bank in Plaquemine. Suit was instituted the 3d September, 1839, and the crop sequestered on the affidavit of the plaintiff, that the defendant was about to gather and remove it beyond the jurisdiction of the court, and beyond .the limits of the State. He prays for judgment on the note as soon as it becomes due,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Williams v. DuerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840
3Cited by4 opinions
- E. Sondheimer Co. v. Richland Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
- Egan v. FushSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1894
- Levy v. GoldbergLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1904
- State National Bank v. New Orleans Brewing Ass'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1897