Legal Opinion

Murphy Jenkins, Jr. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 8, 1966No. 22593_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant moved to vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, alleging that he was improperly sentenced for two offenses, when in fact only one offense was involved. The offenses charged, and for which Appellant is now serving consecutive sentences, were (1) stealing a letter from an authorized mail receptacle; and (2) abstracting from the same letter a Louisiana welfare check, 18 U.S.C.A. § 1708. The District Court held that these constituted two separate and distinct offenses and therefore supported two separate sentences. We agree and affirm. Poffenbarger v. Aderhold, 5 Cir., 1933, 67 F.2d…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Poffenbarger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  2. S. J. Wilburn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  3. William T. Kinsella v. Chesley H. Looney, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  4. Poffenbarger v. AderholdCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  5. Tesciona v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Mae C. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. Samuel George LindsayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  3. Tenorio v. Osinga (In Re Osinga)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API