Legal Opinion

Franklin v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided December 15, 1914PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Elmore Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. W. W. Pearson. Morris Franklin was convicted of an assault with a ' weapon and he appeals. The indictment, judgment and sentence were regular, and sufficient. — Smith v. State, 4 Ala. App. 212. There is no bill of exceptions and nothing to be reviewed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

At the March term, 1913, of the circuit court of Elmore county, the appellant was indicted for an assault with intent to murder, and at the March term, 1914, he was tried and convicted of an assault with a weapon, and ‘a fine of $250 was assessed against him by the jury.

Immediately following the recital of the verdict of the jury in the judgment entry is the judgment of sentence pronounced by the court, showing that, upon the *306failure of the defendant to pay or to secure the fine and costs, he was sentenced to hard labor for the county for a term of 90 days for the payment of the fine and 140…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex parte RobersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  2. Stanfield v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Smith v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Peterson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API