Legal Opinion

Parsons v. Parsons

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 13, 2003No. 03-35015; BAP No. ID-02-01290-MaHRyPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM**

Bethea Parsons appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) *149judgment dismissing as moot Parsons’s appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order denying her petition to set aside a prior sale of her personal property and to recover that property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158. After de novo review, In re Arnold & Baker Farms (Arnold & Baker Farms v. United States), 85 F.3d 1415, 1419 (9th Cir.1996), we affirm.

The BAP properly concluded that Parsons’s appeal was moot because her personal property had already been sold and neither of the exceptions to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mann v. Alexander Dawson Inc. (In re Mann)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Smith v. Edwards & Hale, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API