Fiske v. Gould
United States Circuit Court
1Opinion of the Court
Blodgett, D. J.,
(orally.) The complainant, who is a citizen of tl.e state of New York, charges by his bill that from February 1, 1878, to December 27, 1879, William B. Gould and M. Brooks Gould were copartners, doing business in this city, as merchants and dealers in ornamental hardware, under the firm name of W. B. & M. B. Gould, and that during such time the complainant sold and delivered the firm goods to the value of $5,011.60, for which the firm became justly indebted to him, and that $2,511.60 of such indebtedness remains due and wholly unpaid. That on the twenty-seventh day •of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Payne v. HookSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Menagh v. . WhitwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Rainey v. NanceIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
3Cited by3 opinions
- Burt v. KeyesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1861
- Feidler v. BartlesonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
- Hull v. DillsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1884