Legal Opinion
O'Neil v. Rueb
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 28, 1943No. 33,464PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Youngdahl, Justice.
Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiffs in the sum of $188.95.
It appears that between October 24, 1934, and September 14, 1935, the J. C. Irwin Manufacturing Company, a corporation, furnished, to defendant at an agreed price of $493.40 certain services, labor,, and material consisting of dies, jigs, and fixtures for making and. producing chalk holders, a “gadget” patented by defendant’s wife- and used to mark perforations on materials and to measure cloth.. In 1939 plaintiffs, a copartnership, by purchase and assignment, took over the business of the J. C. Irwin…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Mayor of Vicksburg v. HensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Melady-Briggs Cattle Corp. v. Drovers State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Gustafson v. GustafsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Howe v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Mund v. MundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Minneapolis Auto Parts Co. v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Nelson v. DorrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.