Legal Opinion

Whitfield v. Huling

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 14, 1893PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Memorandum.—Action of assumpsit for commissions, commenced May 11, 1887. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard S. Tuthill, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1892.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court,

Gary, P. J.

The appellees sued for commissions on a loan which they claim to have obtained for the appellant.

Ho review of the facts is necessary. The counsel for the appellee states in his brief that the principal question is, “ Are the plaintiffs prevented from recovering herein because they did not have a license as real estate brokers from the City of Chicago % ”

The question arises upon a plea by the appellant, to which a demurrer was sustained. Ho objection is made to the plea other than that the ordinance can not affect the business relations of the parties.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hustis v. PickandsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1888
  2. Eckert v. CollotAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Firpo v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. Birnbach v. KirspelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  3. First Nat. Bank of Millstadt v. FreantAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API