Dykes v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
MANSMANN, Circuit Judge.
In September, 1994, bus driver Joseph G. Dykes filed suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (“SEPTA”) and the Transport Workers’ Union of Philadelphia, AFL-CIO, Local 234 (“Local 234”). In his two-count complaint, Dykes alleged that his constitutional rights were violated when his SEPTA supervisors asked him to submit to body fluids testing in the absence of reasonable suspicion and that SEPTA and Local 234 conspired to deprive him of due process in connection with the grievance proceedings…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dykes v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995