Legal Opinion

City of East Cleveland v. Board of Education

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1925No. 18738PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jones and Day, JJ.

The conclusion reached Ly the majority of the court finds that Section 3963, General Code, in so far as it relates to furnishing water “for the use of the public school buildings in such city or village” without charge, is unconstitutional. There being less than six judges of that opinion, the Constitution of the state requires that the judgment of those not concurring shall be controlling, and for that reason the views of the minority are set forth.

The petition seeks to recover for water furnished the schools of East Cleveland school district, and claims this right by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Niehaus v. State Ex Rel. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Royal Green Coach Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pauley v. KellyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State Ex Rel. Ramey v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Board of Education of City School District v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  4. City of Columbus v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State ex rel. Grandview Heights City School District Board of Education v. MortonOhio Supreme Court · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API