Kumpe v. Hall

The court did not err in remanding the prisoner to the custody of the sheriff. A substantia] compliance with the provisions of the Penal Code (1910), §§ 904, 906, with reference to affidavits and war*285rants for the arrest of offenders against the penal laws, and the form of such warrants, is all that is required. Williams v. State, 107 Ga. 693, 694 (33 S. E. 641); Brown v. State, 109 Ga. 570 (2) (34 S. E. 1031); Kansas v. White, 76 Kan. 654 (92 Pac. 820, 14 L. R. A. (N. S.) 556). Judgment affirmed.

Nos. 6735, 6736. November 14, 1928. All the Justices concur. Gha/i'les W. And&rson> for plaintiff.