Legal Opinion

Quina v. Harrell

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 6, 1976No. X-8Published

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Appellant Danette S. Quina, a minor, was injured when her long hair became entangled in the drive chain of a go-cart she operated at appellee’s track. In the ensuing action by Danette and her father for money damages, appellee pleaded affirmatively the defense of assumption of risk as well as that of contributory negligence. On consideration of appellee’s motion for directed verdict, the trial court refused to withdraw the issue of assumption of risk from the jury’s consideration; and the court charged the jury, if Danette assumed the risk, it would entirely bar her recovery. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bartholf v. BakerSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  2. Byers v. GunnSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  3. Brady v. KaneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  4. City of Jacksonville Beach v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  5. Parker v. Maule Industries, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API