Legal Opinion

Tomashefski v. Tomashefski

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 22, 1976No. 1302PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*120JACOBS, Judge:

This appeal raises the question of when a petitioner can be considered unable to pay the costs of his divorce for purposes of proceeding in forma pauperis. Because we find the lower court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the petitioner-appellant in the present case was financially able to pay the costs of his divorce, we affirm.

Petitioner, Bernard Tomashefski, filed a petition with the lower court for leave to bring an action in divorce in forma pauperis, i. e. without payment of costs and fees. As is its policy in reviewing such petitions, the lower court held a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Grerlitzki v. FeldserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Wilson v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Whitehead v. WhiteheadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. NicholsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Thompson v. Garden Court, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Griffin v. TedescoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Moskol v. MoskolSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Smith v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API