Legal Opinion

Sweeny v. Pine Bluff Arkansas, City of

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided December 17, 2024No. 4:22-cv-00493Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION CHRISTOPHER D. SWEENY PLAINTIFF v. CASE NO. 4:22-CV-00493-BSM CITY OF PINE BLUFF, ARKANSAS DEFENDANT ORDER The City of Pine Bluff’s motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 20] is granted and Christopher Sweeny’s complaint is dismissed with prejudice. I. BACKGROUND Sweeny was a police officer with the Pine Bluff Police Department from 2013 until he was terminated in 2021. Pl.’s Resp. Def. Statement Undisputed Facts ¶¶ 1, 34, Doc. No. 29 (“Sweeny Facts”). He was investigated for dishonesty in 2017 for taking…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  4. Paul J. Kiel v. Select Artificials, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  5. Holden v. HirnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API