Legal Opinion

SP 141 E 33 LLC v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 31, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DHCR’s determination to revoke petitioner’s MCI rent increase was rationally based in the record and was not arbitrary and capricious (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, 231 [1974]; Matter of 370 Manhattan Ave. Co., L.L.C. v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 11 AD3d 370, 372 [2004]; Matter of West Vil. Assoc. v Division of Hous. & Community Renewal, 277 AD2d 111, 114 [2000]). The determination was based on the facts that the 15-year useful life of the pointing and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. West Village Associates v. Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. 370 Manhattan Ave. Co. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of M.M. & I. Realty Co., LLC v. New York State Div. of Hous. & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  2. Matter of Stuyvesant Town-Peter Cooper Vil. Tenants Assn. v. New York State Div. of Hous. & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
  3. Matter of Stuyvesant Town-Peter Cooper Vil. Tenants Assn. v. New York State Div. of Hous. & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API