Springer v. Heath Motor Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of Heath Motor Company and Tom J. Heath, d/b/a Heath Motor Company, which held that Heath was not the partner of nor principal for L. C. Fisher, from whom the appellant purchased a car. Karl Springer, a minor, purchased an automobile and paid $900 on the purchase price, only to have the automobile repossessed in satisfaction of a prior mortgage. This suit was brought to recover the consideration paid. Heath defended on the grounds that he was in no way a party to nor interested in the transaction, and that the trade was entirely between…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Great American Casualty Co. v. EichelbergerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Continental Oil Co. v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Wewerka v. LantronCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
- Guaranty Bank & Trust Co. v. Beaumont Cadillac Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- W. D. Cleveland v. Houston Sporting GoodsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bluebonnet Oil & Gas Co. v. Panuco Oil Leases, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Chapapas v. Delhi-Taylor Oil Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- United States v. Contemporary Health Management of Hardin County, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1992