Legal Opinion

Springer v. Heath Motor Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 21, 1953No. 12542PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of Heath Motor Company and Tom J. Heath, d/b/a Heath Motor Company, which held that Heath was not the partner of nor principal for L. C. Fisher, from whom the appellant purchased a car. Karl Springer, a minor, purchased an automobile and paid $900 on the purchase price, only to have the automobile repossessed in satisfaction of a prior mortgage. This suit was brought to recover the consideration paid. Heath defended on the grounds that he was in no way a party to nor interested in the transaction, and that the trade was entirely between…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Great American Casualty Co. v. EichelbergerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Continental Oil Co. v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Wewerka v. LantronCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  4. Guaranty Bank & Trust Co. v. Beaumont Cadillac Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. W. D. Cleveland v. Houston Sporting GoodsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bluebonnet Oil & Gas Co. v. Panuco Oil Leases, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  2. Chapapas v. Delhi-Taylor Oil Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  3. United States v. Contemporary Health Management of Hardin County, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API