Legal Opinion

W. E. Anderson & Sons Co. v. Glander

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1951No. 32260PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

The sole question herein presented by the appellant relates to the taxability of purchases of certain “concrete mixer truck chassis.”

It appears from the record that the appellant is partly engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling concrete. Its activities in this respect are confined to the so-called “transit mix” method, wherein the necessary ingredients for producing concrete are placed in a metal mixer at appellant’s plant. This mixer is mounted on and attached to a motor truck chassis, and the mixing or manufacture of the concrete occurs, by the operation of machinery connected…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tri-State Asphalt Corp. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Canton Malleable Iron Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Tulsa MacHinery Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  3. State v. Reynolds Metals CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  4. Wakefield Ready-Mixed Concrete Co., Inc. v. State Tax CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
  5. State v. Four States Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API