People v. Rivera
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, J.
*1479Defendant initially claims that County Court erred when it denied his motion to suppress because Perry’s identification of him was secured as the result of a suggestive showup conducted by the police shortly after the robbery was committed. “Showup identifications are permissible where the showup was ‘conducted in close geographic and temporal proximity to the crime . . . and the procedure used was not unduly suggestive’ ” (People v Harris, 64 AD3d 883, 883 [2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 836 [2009], quoting People v Brisco, 99 NY2d 596, 597 [2003]; see People v Judware, 75 AD3d 841, 843 [2010], lv…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. BriscoNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- People v. PurnellNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. AnonymousNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
- People v. ShepherdAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016