Legal Opinion

People v. Rivera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 27, 2012PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, J.

*1479Defendant initially claims that County Court erred when it denied his motion to suppress because Perry’s identification of him was secured as the result of a suggestive showup conducted by the police shortly after the robbery was committed. “Showup identifications are permissible where the showup was ‘conducted in close geographic and temporal proximity to the crime . . . and the procedure used was not unduly suggestive’ ” (People v Harris, 64 AD3d 883, 883 [2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 836 [2009], quoting People v Brisco, 99 NY2d 596, 597 [2003]; see People v Judware, 75 AD3d 841, 843 [2010], lv…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. People v. BriscoNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. People v. PurnellNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. People v. AnonymousNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. People v. ShepherdAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API