People v. Chilton
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of County Court should be affirmed.
The suppression court found a lack of probable cause to stop defendant’s van for alleged traffic infractions. On appeal, the County Court properly held that the legality of the stop should be measured against a reasonable suspicion standard (see, People v Sobotker, 43 NY2d 559; People v Ingle, 36 NY2d 413). It affirmed, however, stating that "[t]he objective facts and circumstances did not support the stop as a matter of law based on the evidence the town court had before it” (emphasis added).
Whether a police officer…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. IngleNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. SobotkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. HarrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. CastroNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. DeaconAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. KaminskiJustice Court of Town of Rhinebeck · 1991
- People v. HumplebyNew York Justice Court · 2005
- People v. KehleyCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.