Legal Opinion

People v. Chilton

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1987PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of County Court should be affirmed.

The suppression court found a lack of probable cause to stop defendant’s van for alleged traffic infractions. On appeal, the County Court properly held that the legality of the stop should be measured against a reasonable suspicion standard (see, People v Sobotker, 43 NY2d 559; People v Ingle, 36 NY2d 413). It affirmed, however, stating that "[t]he objective facts and circumstances did not support the stop as a matter of law based on the evidence the town court had before it” (emphasis added).

Whether a police officer…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. IngleNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. SobotkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. People v. HarrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. CastroNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. People v. DeaconAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. People v. KaminskiJustice Court of Town of Rhinebeck · 1991
  4. People v. HumplebyNew York Justice Court · 2005
  5. People v. KehleyCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API