Legal Opinion

Maclean v. Fitzsimons

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1890PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from 'Wayne. (Reilly, J.) Bill to discharge complainant as indorser of certain notes, and for their cancellation, as far as his liability as indorser is concerned. Complainant appeals from decree dismissing bill on general demurrer. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, C. J.

The defendants interposed a general ■demurrer, for want of equity, to a bill of complaint filed by complainant, in which he states that, prior to October 6, 1885, defendants were copartners in the wholesale .grocer business under the name of Beatty, Fitzsimons & •Co., and had in their employ Robert Beattie as a traveling salesman; that, shortly prior to the date above, they had ascertained that Robert was behind in his accounts ■about $2,000, and threatened to discharge him unless he paid or secured them for the amount of the shortage; that Robert applied to complainant to indorse his notes…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Morley v. Automobile Club of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Scholten v. ScholtenMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Draper v. NelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Multiplex Concrete MacHinery Co. v. SaxerMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Muskegon Central Dispatch 911 v. Tiburon, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API