Legal Opinion
Bradley v. Baliles
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided July 10, 1986No. Civ. A. 3353-RPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MERHIGE, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in this matter are the School Board of the City of Richmond and various Richmond Public School District (“RPS”) students and parents. Plaintiffs contend that the defendant, the Commonwealth of Virginia (“State”), is constitutionally required to provide additional funding to the Richmond Public School District for compensatory and remedial programs because such programs are necessary to eliminate the vestiges of prior State-mandated segregation. In order to prevail on such a claim, plaintiffs must establish, first, that the State was at least…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Green v. County School Board of New Kent CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Milliken v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Griffin v. School Bd. of Prince Edward Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Richmond School Board v. BalilesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Ronda Everett v. Pitt County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- School Board v. BalilesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Ronda Everett v. Pitt County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015