Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Jamie Matlick Farris, United States of America v. Marcus Theodore Baumann, United States of America v. Carl Richard Tamuty

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 19, 1980No. 78-2514, 78-2624 and 78-2905PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:

Jamie Matlick (Kelly) Farris and Marcus Theodore Baumann appeal their convictions on two counts each of securities fraud in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 77q(a). Carl Richard Tamuty appeals his conviction on nine counts of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341. We affirm in part, and reverse in part.

I. FACTS

The appellants were among 23 individuals and firms indicted for securities fraud and mail fraud in connection with a Ponzi scheme which, for a time, produced a substantial cash flow from the interstate sales of real estate mortgage notes and connected instruments in…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. United States v. Benjamin F. Gay Iii, Roy M. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. People v. WhitlowIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  3. People v. FigueroaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. In Re National Mortgage Equity Corp. Mortgage Pool Certificates Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1986
  5. Federal Trade Commission v. Kitco of Nevada, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1985

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API