Legal Opinion
Halbert v. Debode
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 3, 1897PublishedCited by 17 opinions
Appeal from Hill. Tried below before Hon. J. M. Hall.
1Opinion of the Court
NEILL, Associate Justice.
We adopt appellants’ statement of the nature and result of the suit, which is as follows:
“This suit was a consolidation for trial of four originally distinct actions of trespass to try title to four several tracts of land, embracing altogether 1426 acres, in the District Court of Hill County, in which appellants (Mollie P. Halbert, S. A. Lane, and T. F. Threadgill, all married women, joined by their husbands) were plaintiffs and appellees, (whose names it is not necessary to mention) the defendants.
“The petitions of plaintiffs were, in the usual statutory form, while…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- F. J. Harrison & Co. v. BoringTexas Supreme Court · 1875
- Watkins v. EdwardsTexas Supreme Court · 1859
- Guilford v. LoveTexas Supreme Court · 1878
- Hill v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Lyne v. SanfordTexas Supreme Court · 1891
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Panhandle & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. BurtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Uvalde Co. v. TribbleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Ackers v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Sperry v. MoodyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- R. B. Godley Lumber Co. v. TeagardenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.